Technique govt chairman Michael Saylor took to social media on Sunday to element his “110 causes” why a proposed momentary fork to restrict non-monetary transactions on the Bitcoin community, or BIP-110, is a nasty concept.
Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal-110 was launched in December 2025 to cease nonfungible token-like Ordinals inscriptions and different arbitrary knowledge from spamming the community and to protect BTC’s essential use as a peer-to-peer money system.
In a roughly 3,700 phrase submit on X.com, the person accountable for the biggest Bitcoin (BTC) company treasury made a case for what he mentioned are “impartial guidelines, onerous consensus, open markets, and permissionless innovation.”
Supply: Michael Saylor on X.com
“Many Bitcoiners I respect help BIP 110. They wish to maintain validation accessible, defend node operators from undesirable prices and content material, protect reasonably priced funds, and maintain Bitcoin targeted on sound cash quite than general-purpose knowledge storage. These are critical issues. I share the goals. I disagree in regards to the treatment,” Saylor mentioned. He added:
“This text critiques the proposal, not the folks behind it. I assume good religion. Bitcoin is strongest after we can disagree vigorously with out mistaking allies for enemies.”
As of 12 p.m. ET, on Sunday, the submit had been considered 879,000 occasions, with 692 replies and 852 retweets.
BIP-110 is likely one of the extra notable protocol-level disputes within the Bitcoin improvement group for the reason that Blocksize Wars between 2015 and 2017, when ecosystem contributors debated whether or not it was price risking a sequence break up to lift the block measurement restrict for scalability.
The proposal was launched by pseudonymous Bitcoin developer “Dathon Ohm” with the help of Ocean protocol founder Luke Dashjr. Opponents embody Blockstream CEO Adam Again.
Associated: Bitcoin nodes operating BIP-110 crosses 2% as spam wars warmth up
Little certainty on BHP-110 approval
To make certain, BIP-110 received’t be activated until 55% of Bitcoin nodes validating blocks are in help of the proposal throughout a Bitcoin block “interval.”
Within the final interval, interval quantity 475 between block 955,584 and 957,599, only one% of blocks had been in help.
The dispute comes at a time when Ordinals exercise is at close to all-time lows, with fewer than 10,000 Ordinals inscribed into the Bitcoin blockchain every day during the last month, down from the greater than 400,000 seen throughout its peak in August 2023.
Change in day by day Ordinals inscriptions since December 2022.
Supply: Dune Analytics
Bock has beforehand criticized BIP-110, describing it as a “quest to police different folks.”
He mentioned Bitcoin’s decentralization ought to imply “you possibly can’t impose your views on others,” calling it incompatible with BTC’s cypherpunk ethos of permissionless, censorship-resistant cash.
Dashjr and different BIP-110 supporters have known as Ordinals-driven bloat a “critical risk” to the community, prompting the necessity for an imminent repair.
They’ve additionally argued BIP-110 wouldn’t trigger a sequence break up, as many concern, whereas including that the BIP-110 fork imposes a short lived one-year restrict and thus wouldn’t invalidate fee-paying transactions over the long run.
Options: From Bitcoin critics to blockchain believers: The 5 largest crypto backflips
