Spot costs for lithium have skilled important volatility to start 2026, with Scotiabank analysts characterizing the current surge as disconnected from underlying market fundamentals.
Home Chinese language lithium carbonate costs have risen 34% year-to-date, whereas spodumene costs have elevated by 46%. The speedy rise has seen lithium carbonate transfer from roughly $18,000 per metric tonne to $23,000 per metric tonne in a single week. Futures markets have reacted equally, buying and selling at even greater premiums.
Scotiabank’s evaluation suggests this rally shouldn’t be at present pushed by end-user EV demand, however slightly by regulatory adjustments in China. Particularly, Beijing’s determination to roll again value-added tax export rebates seems to have triggered a wave of front-loaded export demand as patrons try and preempt the coverage transfer.
The analysts warn that as a result of this worth motion is essentially reactional to coverage slightly than a structural shift in consumption, there may be important danger of worth retracement as soon as the speedy export exercise concludes. They observe that whereas fairness markets had been pricing in lithium at $17,000 to $18,000 per tonne, the spot worth has shortly outpaced these ranges.
“as soon as this train is full,
look ahead to retracement danger – each on the commodities and barely much less so on the equities,” Scotia writes.
We’re seeing a few of that as we speak with lithium costs decrease and equities notably decrease with Albernale down 6%.
ALB inventory
Scotiabank has instructed a defensive rotation for buyers trying to handle danger. Whereas sustaining a optimistic long-term outlook on the sector, they advocate rotating publicity from Albemarle into Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile (SQM). The rationale is predicated on relative sensitivity to commodity costs; SQM is estimated to have roughly half the leverage to identify lithium worth actions in comparison with Albemarle, doubtlessly providing higher resilience ought to spot costs appropriate as anticipated.
Observe that again in September throughout one other squeeze in lithium shares based mostly on a possible Trump funding in a lithium inventory, the identical analysts warned that costs of LAC had gone manner too far. They finally fell 50% within the following three weeks.
