The variety of Bitcoin (BTC) nodes signaling assist for Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a short lived tender fork limiting the quantity of knowledge included in every transaction on the consensus degree, rose to 2.38%.
583 out of 24,481 nodes are operating BIP-110, and the first node software program implementation for operating the tender fork proposal is Bitcoin Knots, in accordance to The Bitcoin Portal.
BIP-110 limits the scale of transaction outputs to 34 bytes and caps the OP_RETURN information restrict to 83 bytes. The short-term tender fork will likely be deployed for 1 12 months, with attainable extension or alteration after the 1-year time period, in keeping with the proposal’s GitHub web page.
OP_RETURN is a script code that permits customers to embed arbitrary information and has been the topic of intense debate inside the Bitcoin group following the discharge of Bitcoin Core model 30, the most recent improve of probably the most broadly used Bitcoin node software program.
The OP_RETURN restrict was capped at 83 bytes, which Bitcoin Core builders unilaterally eliminated in Bitcoin Core model 30, following a controversial pull request, first proposed in April 2025. The proposal was usually opposed by the Bitcoin group.
Associated: Bitcoiners reject quantum computing fears as reason behind value stoop
The arbitrary information difficulty creates a divide inside the Bitcoin group
The Bitcoin Core replace that eliminated the information restrict went dwell in October 2025, sparking a torrent of detrimental suggestions from critics, who say that eradicating the arbitrary information restrict incentivizes spam on the Bitcoin ledger.
Arbitrary information will increase the storage prices of operating a Bitcoin node, and the prohibitive value results in elevated centralization of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin nodes may be run on consumer-grade computer systems, in contrast to high-throughput blockchains that generate massive portions of knowledge and require specialised {hardware}.
Rising node {hardware} necessities undermines the Bitcoin protocol’s worth proposition of being a decentralized financial community, in keeping with critics. Bitcoin advocate and educator Matthew Kratter mentioned:
“It is like a kind of parasitical vegetation, like ivy, fully overlaying a tree, consuming up the tree, after which the interior scaffolding collapses, and the ivy collapses as a result of it is mainly destroyed the construction. That is what spam has the potential to do to Bitcoin.”
Others like Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin Core contributor, assist the uncapped OP_Return Restrict, arguing that filters do little to cease spam on the community.
Journal: Large questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year energy outage?
