OpenAI CEO Sam Altman arrives on the federal courthouse, because the trial in Elon Musk’s lawsuit over OpenAI’s for-profit conversion continues, in Oakland, California, U.S., Might 14, 2026.
Manuel Orbegozo | Reuters
The primary section of the Musk v. Altman trial concluded proceedings in federal court docket in Oakland, California, on Thursday after attorneys for Elon Musk and OpenAI offered their closing arguments to the jury.
The nine-person jury, which is made up of six ladies and three males, will start deliberating on Monday. The jury’s verdict will likely be advisory, which implies Choose Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the ultimate determination on legal responsibility.
“You could resolve the case solely on the proof earlier than you,” Gonzalez Rogers informed the jury Thursday morning, in studying out the formal directions. “You’ll recall you took an oath to take action.”
Musk sued OpenAI, its CEO Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, the corporate’s president, in 2024, alleging they went again on their dedication to maintain the bogus intelligence startup a nonprofit and for unjustly enriching themselves. Musk, who co-founded OpenAI alongside Altman and Brockman in 2015, claims the roughly $38 million he donated to the corporate was used for unauthorized business functions.
Throughout Thursday’s proceedings, Musk’s lawyer, Steven Molo, reiterated his arguments that OpenAI did not open supply its know-how, prioritize AI security and comply with nonprofit customs and practices. He additionally claimed that OpenAI insiders and buyers, together with Altman, Brockman and Microsoft, enriched themselves at Musk’s expense.
Sarah Eddy and William Savitt, attorneys for OpenAI, pushed again on Molo’s statements on Thursday. They mentioned Altman and Brockman by no means made commitments to Musk about OpenAI’s company construction, and that Musk’s donations had been spent and used correctly. Additionally they famous that the Tesla and SpaceX CEO filed the lawsuit solely after launching his competing AI startup, xAI.
“He by no means cared in regards to the nonprofit construction,” Eddy informed the jury. “What he cared about was successful.”
Microsoft can be named as a defendant within the lawsuit, and legal professional Russell Cohen offered the corporate’s closing arguments to the jury. Musk accused Microsoft, OpenAI’s principal investor, of aiding and abetting the corporate’s purported breach of charitable belief. Cohen mentioned Microsoft had no information of these occasions and could not have participated in them.
William Savitt, lead legal professional representing OpenAI and Sam Altman, speaks to the press exterior the Ronald V. Dellums US Courthouse the place the Elon Musk v OpenAI trial proceeded for its third day in Oakland, California, on April 29, 2026.
Amy Osborne | AFP | Getty Pictures
Because the jury begins deliberations on Monday, the second stage of the trial, often called the cures section, will even start.
Gonzalez Rogers will hear arguments in regards to the potential damages and subsequent steps that must be taken if OpenAI, Altman and Brockman are discovered liable. The jury is not going to weigh in on this section.
Musk has requested for a spread of outcomes within the lawsuit because it was first filed in 2024. Most just lately, he requested the choose to contemplate eradicating Altman and Brockman from their roles at OpenAI, and to unwind the corporate’s 2025 recapitalization.
In January, Musk’s legal professionals mentioned their consumer was entitled to as much as $134 billion in damages from OpenAI and Microsoft, calling them “wrongful good points.” His staff now says any “ill-gotten good points” must be returned to OpenAI’s basis.
There’ll solely be a choice within the cures section if there’s a discovering of legal responsibility.
Gonzalez Rogers has presided over prior high-profile know-how circumstances, which may clarify why she selected to enlist the assistance of an advisory jury.
“Judges usually empanel advisory juries once they both need the group judgment of the jurors or they need ‘cowl’ in a extremely seen case,” Steven Baicker-McKee, an affiliate regulation professor at Duquesne College, informed CNBC.
Former President Barack Obama appointed Gonzalez Rogers to U.S. District Court docket for the Northern District of California in 2011, and he or she beforehand oversaw the antitrust case between Epic Video games and Apple.
Gonzalez Rogers confirmed little endurance for any shenanigans from the legal professionals through the first section of the Musk v. Altman trial, repeatedly chiding representatives for each events once they stepped out of line.
“You do not need to be held in contempt I assure you,” she warned one lawyer on Tuesday.
With the jurors, nonetheless, Gonzalez Rogers has been heat and pleasant, cracking jokes and even bringing them candies on one event. She concluded Thursday’s proceedings by reminding the jury that lunch will likely be supplied throughout deliberations.
—CNBC’s Kate Rooney contributed to this report.
WATCH: It’s the ultimate full day of testimony within the Musk vs. OpenAI trial: Right here’s what to know
