FOX Enterprise’ Stuart Varney analyzes Europe’s strict speech guidelines underneath the Digital Companies Act, the arrests tied to on-line posts and his warning in opposition to permitting European requirements to dictate what People can say on social media.
Elon Musk and Trump administration officers delivered blistering criticism of the European Union after its government department issued a $140 million nice in opposition to his social media platform, X.
“The EU ought to be abolished and sovereignty returned to particular person international locations, in order that governments can higher characterize their folks,” Musk wrote on X on Saturday, earlier than including, “AbolishTheEU.”
The European Fee mentioned Friday it was fining X for “non-compliance with transparency obligations” underneath the Digital Companies Act (DSA), including that it was particularly “holding X accountable” for what the EU deems “misleading” design of X’s “blue checkmark,” a “lack of transparency of its promoting repository,” and “failure to supply entry to public information for researchers.” The fee posted the $140 million nice announcement on X.
Elon Musk, Vice President JD Vance, heart, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, proper, have slammed the EU’s $140 million nice in opposition to X. (Nathan Howard/Reuters; Anna Moneymaker/Getty Pictures; Mandel Ngan/AFP by way of Getty Pictures / Getty Pictures)
On Friday, in response to an X submit from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, calling the nice an “abomination” and saying that President Donald Trump ought to impose sanctions “till this travesty is reversed,” Musk replied, “The ‘EU’ imposed this loopy nice not simply on X, but in addition on me personally, which is much more insane!”
“Due to this fact, it might appear acceptable to use our response not simply to the EU, but in addition to the people who took this motion in opposition to me,” Musk wrote, calling the nice in one other submit “bulls—.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio mentioned on X that the nice “isn’t simply an assault on X, it’s an assault on all American tech platforms and the American folks by international governments.”
Earlier than the nice was introduced, Vice President JD Vance mentioned, “The EU ought to be supporting free speech not attacking American firms over rubbish.”
The EU adopted the DSA in 2022 to manage on-line platforms comparable to social networks and to “forestall unlawful and dangerous actions on-line and the unfold of disinformation,” however the regulation has since confronted opposition from the Trump administration amid its free speech promotion on the worldwide stage.
Thomas Reigner, spokesperson for Tech Sovereignty, Protection, House and Analysis on the fee, argued at a briefing on Friday that the nice was not associated to content material moderation.

U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick is among the many Trump administration officers talking out in opposition to the nice positioned on X. (Dursun Aydemir/Anadolu by way of Getty Pictures / Getty Pictures)
“Right now’s resolution has nothing to do with content material moderation,” Reigner mentioned. “It’s about transparency provisions for residents right here within the European Union.”
SAM ALTMAN EYES ROCKET COMPANY TO TAKE ON ELON MUSK IN SPACE RACE
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick mentioned on X that, “The Digital Companies Act is designed to stifle free speech and American tech firms,” and, “We’ve made our place clear to our counterparts in Europe.”
“Overseas bureaucrats have zero proper to inform People what they will and might’t say,” added Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.
“As soon as once more, Europe is fining a profitable U.S. tech firm for being a profitable U.S. tech firm,” mentioned Federal Communication Fee (FCC) Chair Brendan Carr. “Europe is taxing People to subsidize a continent held again by Europe’s personal suffocating laws.”

Elon Musk throughout a information convention with President Donald Trump, not pictured, within the Oval Workplace of the White Home on Friday, Might 30, 2025. (Francis Chung/Politico/Bloomberg by way of Getty Pictures / Getty Pictures)
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., mentioned, “America is finished wanting the opposite method whereas international governments search to censor our folks and bully our firms.”
The European Fee additional defined its reasoning in a press launch.
“X’s use of the ‘blue checkmark’ for ‘verified accounts’ deceives customers,” the fee mentioned in assertion. “On X, anybody will pay to acquire the ‘verified’ standing with out the corporate meaningfully verifying who’s behind the account, making it tough for customers to guage the authenticity of accounts and content material they interact with. This deception exposes customers to scams, together with impersonation frauds, in addition to different types of manipulation by malicious actors.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS
“X’s commercial repository fails to fulfill the transparency and accessibility necessities of the DSA. Accessible and searchable advert repositories are crucial for researchers and civil society to detect scams, hybrid menace campaigns, coordinated info operations and pretend ads,” it additionally mentioned.
FOX Enterprise’ Emma Colton contributed to this report.

